name | Amanita ochraceomaculata | ||||||||
author |
Neville, Poumarat & Fraiture.
2000.
Boll. Gruppo Micol. G. Bresadola 43(2):
261. | ||||||||
name status | nomen acceptum | ||||||||
MycoBank nos. | 467417 | ||||||||
GenBank nos. |
Due to delays in data processing at GenBank, some accession numbers may lead to unreleased (pending) pages.
These pages will eventually be made live, so try again later.
| ||||||||
holotypes | in herb. Pierre Neville | ||||||||
partial veil | absent. | ||||||||
lamella edge tissue | sterile. | ||||||||
basidiospores |
protolog: [250/20/8] (9.0-)
10.0 - 12.0 (-17.5) × (8.0-) 9.0 - 11.0 (-14.0) μm,
(L = 10.4 - 11.2 μm; L' = 10.8 μm;
W = 9.7 - 10.6 μm; W' = 10.1 μm;
Q = 1.0 - 1.12 (-1.33); Q = 1.05 - 1.11;
Q' = 1.07), hyaline, smooth, inamyloid,
globose
to subglobose; apiculus distinct.
[Note: The Q data cited is incompatible with values
produced following the
methodologies of RET or Yang because values
< 1.0 are accepted; such data were eliminated
from this entry,
but were included in reported averages (given here
as originally published).—ed.] | ||||||||
ecology |
protolog:
Gregarious. Always under
Picea abies.
Switzerland: At 1340 m elev. | ||||||||
material examined | protolog: BELGIUM: LUXEMBOURG—Chiny - Termes, La Maisse, 13.vi.1992 Fraiture 1563 (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, BR); Izel, Moyen 18.vi.1992 Fraiture 1565 (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, BR), 1566 (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, BR). FRANCE: AIN—Hauteville, s.d. Vizier s.n. [Neville 96.09.19.01] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat). ARDÈCHE—St-Agréve, s.d. Garcia s.n. [Neville 96.09.24.02] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat), s.n. [Neville 96.09.24.18] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat). AVEYRON—ca. Brusque, forêt d'Arnac, s.d. Berlan s.n. [Neville 95.10.25.11] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat in two packets labeled "a" & "b"). ISÉRE—Alpe d'Huez, s.d. P. Roux 96.7.2544 (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. P. Roux); Massif de Belledonne, Marais de Séglière, s.d. Estades s.n. [Neville 92.09.11.01] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat in two packets labeled "a" and "b"). JURA—Lelex, s.d. Mazuire s.n. [Neville 96.09.19.10] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat); unkn. loc., s.d. Lamoura[e?] s.n. [Neville 96.09.19.06] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat). ITALY: VENETO—Belluno - Longaruno, Pian di Caiada, s.d. Neville 97.07.13.30 (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat); Trichiana, Mellere, s.d. Neville 97.0713.26 (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat in two packets labeled "a" and "b"); Trichiana, Pranolz, 15[?].vii.1997 L. Alpago-Novello s.n. [P. Neville 97.07.13.27] (holotype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat in two packets labeled "a" and "b"), Neville 97.07.13.30 (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat in two packets labeled "a" and "b"); Trichiana, Pranolz, diverse forests, s.d. L. Alpago-Novello & Fouchier s.n. [Neville 98.07.12.17] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat), s.n. [Neville 98.07.12.22] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat), s.n. [Neville 98.07.12.23] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat), s.n. [Neville 98.07.12.24] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat); Taibon Agordino, s.d. L. Alpago-Novello & Fouchier s.n. [Neville 98.07.12.18] (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, in herb. S. Poumarat). SWITZERLAND: FRIBOURG—Parabock, Cerniat, 18.vii.1996 Ayer 96.05.3300 (paratype of A. ochraceomaculata, BR as "A. submembranacea"). [Note: There are several typographical errors as well as an idiosyncratic presentation that make the conversion of collection data from (Neville, Poumarat and Fraiture 2000) difficult.—ed.] | ||||||||
citations | —R. E. Tulloss | ||||||||
editors | RET | ||||||||
Information to support the viewer in reading the content of "technical" tabs can be found here.
Each spore data set is intended to comprise a set of measurements from a single specimen made by a single observer; and explanations prepared for this site talk about specimen-observer pairs associated with each data set. Combining more data into a single data set is non-optimal because it obscures observer differences (which may be valuable for instructional purposes, for example) and may obscure instances in which a single collection inadvertently contains a mixture of taxa.