For the time being, please see the technical tab for this taxon.
discussion
—R. E. Tulloss
brief editors
RET
name
Amanita sp-GSM04
name status
cryptonomen temporarium
GenBank nos.
Due to delays in data processing at GenBank, some accession numbers may lead to unreleased (pending) pages.
These pages will eventually be made live, so try again later.
12.vii.2004 R. E. Tulloss 7-12-04-M (RET 375-9, haplotype 1)
K. W. Hughes Lab., Univ. of Tenn., Knoxville
intro
Olive text indicates a specimen that has not been thoroughly examined (for example, for microscopic details) and marks other places in the text where data is missing or uncertain.
The following material is based on molecular studies
of Drs. K. W. Hughes and L. V. Kudzma and other
original research or R. E. Tulloss.
Basidiome small.
pileus
brownish gray, very dark over disc, sometimes with distinct whitish pruinosity or frosty appearance; context white, thin; margin striate; universal veil absent.
[Note: The pruinose of frosty appearance suggests that the universal veil is not segregated from the pileipellis by a gelatinizing layer.—ed.]
lamellae
white in side view; lamellulae ??.
stipe
white, finely pulverulent; context ??; exannulate; universal veil as saccate volva, white, membranous, persistent, sometimes staining pale orange.
odor/taste
not recorded.
macrochemical tests
none recorded.
lamella edge tissue
sterile.
ecology
Solitary. At 780 - 945 m elev.
material examined
U.S.A.: TENNESSEE—Sevier
Co. - ca. Gatlinburg, GSMNP, Cherokee Orchard
[35.6811° N/ 83.4625° W, 945 m], 12.vii.2004
R. E. Tulloss 7-12-04-M (RET 375-9, nrITS & nrLSU
seq'd.). GSMNP, ca.
Gatlinburg, Grotto Falls trailhead
[35.6752° N/ 83.4858° W, 780 m], 12.vii.2004 E. B.
Lickey s.n. [Tulloss 7-12-04-AE] (RET 376-2, nrITS
& nrLSU seq'd.).
citations
—R. E. Tulloss
editors
RET
Information to support the viewer in reading the content of "technical" tabs
can be found here.
Each spore data set is intended to comprise a set of measurements from a single specimen made by a single observer;
and explanations prepared for this site talk about specimen-observer pairs associated with each data set.
Combining more data into a single data set is non-optimal because it obscures observer differences
(which may be valuable for instructional purposes, for example) and may obscure instances in which
a single collection inadvertently contains a mixture of taxa.